After Years Of Profiting From Selling Ritalin, New Study Discovers Ritalin Has No Effect On ADHD Patients

One of the main reasons given by people who reject the claims of Happeh Theory is that “Scientists disagree with those claims”. Those poor trusting people have been brainwashed to believe that scientists always know what they are talking about, and that scientists should always be trusted and believed before anyone else is trusted and believed.

The posts found in this category of the website provide examples of scientists being wrong about their pronouncements. Hopefully the open minded reader, after perusing all of the examples of scientists making mistakes found in this and other related categories, will realize that doubting the claims of Happeh Theory because scientists disagree with them is not a rational act. If scientists can be wrong about all of the examples posted on this website, then of course they can be and are wrong in their disagreements with the claims of Happeh Theory.

The study that is the basis of this post discovered that the drug Ritalin, which has been prescribed to ADHD patients for over a decade, has no long term beneficial effect. The patients could have been taking sugar pills all that time and experienced the same relief from their ADHD symptoms.

Just think of all the money those scientists and the Pharmaceutical companies made from Ritalin prescriptions over that decade.

Never trust a scientist. They lie. They promote ideas for profit. And they are just plain stoopid and don’t know what they are talking about.

The original news story is reprinted below.

———————————————

Drugs such as Ritalin make no difference to the long-term outcomes of children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, who continue to struggle academically and mentally as they get older, early research findings suggest.

The Murdoch Childrens Research Institute has been following 178 children with ADHD and 212 children without ADHD for three years to identify what factors make a difference to the development of children with the disorder.

By the age of seven there are severe academic, social and mental health differences between children with ADHD and their peers, the Children’s Attention Project, which is funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council, found. Three years on, these disparities persist, preliminary findings suggest.

Four times as many 10-year-olds with ADHD suffer from mental health problems such as anxiety and oppositional disorder. They are also well behind their peers in their maths and reading abilities. There was no difference in outcomes between boys and girls.

“All of them continue to be substantially at risk of academic and mental health problems as they had been at seven,” one of the chief investigators of the project, paediatrician Daryl Efron said.

The 13 per cent of children in the study who were taking medication such as Ritalin to treat their ADHD were doing no better or worse than their unmedicated peers at age 10. “Medication doesn’t alter the long-term outcomes of kids [with ADHD],” Dr Efron said. He cautioned that the project wasn’t designed to test the long-term effectiveness of drugs.

Dr Efron said drugs like Ritalin were very effective in reducing the day-to-day symptoms of ADHD “but we haven’t progressed very much beyond that”.

“Medication is fantastic for treating the symptoms of ADHD . . . helping kids be calmer and focus better. It doesn’t surprise me that so far we haven’t shown medication makes a difference to kids doing better into the future.”

Dr Efron said doctors need to find out what combination of support and intervention does make a difference long-term. He suggested it could involve medication, parent support and remedial strategies.

It is estimated that 5 per cent of children have ADHD, although not all are diagnosed. Children with ADHD are at greater risk of poor outcomes in adolescence and adulthood, including mental health issues like anxiety, learning difficulties and getting in trouble with the law.

Dr Efron said that the mean age of being diagnosed with ADHD isnine years, and 80 per cent of children with ADHD who are seeing a paediatrician are on medication.

Paula Burgess has found that occupational therapy and the family’s new dog have made the most difference to her seven-year-old son, Jesse, who has ADHD. Jesse will ask his mum to rock him on the yoga ball when he feels his symptoms escalating.

“He’ll say ‘Mummy I’m not feeling right, can you rock me please’ and then he’ll come straight down,” Ms Burgess said. Meanwhile, the presence of border collie River is helping reduce Jesse’s anxiety.

It’s been a far more positive experience than the disastrous six weeks Jesse spent on Ritalin. While his teachers noticed an improvement, Jesse’s anxiety spiralled, and he would lash out at his mother when he got home from school, kicking and punching her.

“We want to make sure he can get through school, but not at the price of the imbalance it caused in his body, and the tension it caused between us,” Ms Burgess said.

Ms Burgess hasn’t ruled out medicating Jesse in the future if necessary, but for now the family is managing his ADHD with occupational therapy, routine, monitoring his diet, support from the school he attends, and the psychologist and psychiatrist he sees. River is being trained as a therapy dog, and later in the year Jesse will also try equine therapy.

“We’ll take it day by day and see what happens,” Ms Burgess said. “It’s a mix of things [that work], having the right team in place, having people to go to to ask questions, getting constant feedback on what’s going on.”

“With ADHD you can have a false sense of security, you can think it’s going really well, then everything goes crap and it’s almost like starting again.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *