HappehCom

Mar 142011
 

According to Happeh Theory, Masturbation will make a human being blind and crippled, as well as causing many other physical changes and health problems to the body. There are other activities that will produce some or all of the same physical changes and health problems that Masturbation does. Those activities include Excessive Exercise, Excessive Sex, Homosexuality, Injection of Drugs, Snorting of Drugs, and Anorexia.

The blindness caused by Masturbation and those other activities could be described as “One Eyed” blindness. While both eyes will undergo a degradation of visual ability, one of the eyes will be much more severely affected than the other eye. The factors causing severe blindness in the one eye are so strong they also change the physical appearance of the face surrounding the eye.

The next picture shows a character from a Japanese “Anime”, which is the Japanese word for “cartoon”.

How many eyes does the man have? Like any other human being he has two eyes. Or does he? There is a monocle covering his left eye. That means the accurate answer to the question “How many eyes does the man have” is really “one”. Although he does have two eyes, only one of them is visible.

The picture of the cartoon character fits the definition of “One Eyed Blind”. According to what has been said previously, it would seem the the cartoon character must be a man who Masturbated Excessively, engaged in Excessive Sex, was a Homosexual man, Injected Drugs, Snorted Drugs, or was an Anorexic.

Because the character is from a cartoon for children, it seems unlikely any of the sexual reasons would be the cause of the man’s one eyed blindness. That would remove Homosexuality, Excessive Sex, and Excessive Masturbation from the list of causes for the cartoon character’s One Eyed Blindness.

The cartoon did not portray the character as Anorexic, nor was there any indication the character used Injectable or Snorting drugs. That exhausts the list of possible causes of One Eyed Blindness that have been mentioned in this blog entry.

If none of the previously stated reasons explains the cause of the cartoon character’s One Eyed Blindness, what could be the reason for drawing the character with One Eyed Blindness? Was it just a design decision? Someone thought the character looked appealing with only one visible eye and that is the only reason the character has one visible eye? Or was there some other more meaningful reason?

It is common sense that the life experiences of any human being creating anything would affect the finished creation. The cartoon portrayed the character as an evil man doing evil things. Therefore it seems reasonable to believe that in the life experience of the creators of the cartoon, evil people are One Eyed Blind.

According to Happeh Theory that is exactly the case. Evil people do display the same One Eyed Blindness associated with Masturbation, Excessive Sex, Homosexuality, Injecting of Drugs, Snorting of Drugs, and Anorexia. Evil people also display the other bodily changes that Happeh Theory claims are caused by Masturbation, etc.

The reason why the body of an evil human being will change in the same way the body of a masturbator will  change, is that both activities act on the same part of the body in a similar way. Both masturbation and the state of being known as evil, are associated with a shrinking and tightening of one side of the body. The shrinking force is so strong that it will blind the eye on the side of the body that shrinks.

The next picture shows the cartoon character in a state of excitement. When an evil person or a masturbator, etc. becomes excited, the changes those activities have created in their body are exacerbated, which makes them easier to see.

Because the character’s left eye is the blind eye, it seems obvious that it must be the left side of the character’s body that has been shrunken by evil. That preliminary conclusion is supported by the fact the left side of the character’s mouth in his current excited state has been pulled open wider than the right side of his mouth,

and there is a gap in his teeth on the left side of the mouth.

The shrinkage of the body caused by masturbation or evil is so strong that it can affect the teeth. The teeth will either grow crooked, become diseased in some way which causes them to fall out, or some physical act will occur that will knock out the affected teeth.

The mouth opens wider on the left side because the shrinkage of the left side of the body pulls the upper left lip upwards

and the left lower lip downwards.

The way in which the mouth has been described as opening should make the alert reader wonder. If the shrinkage of the left side of the body pulls the left side of the mouth open wider, how come the left eye is closed and blind? Shouldn’t the the top of the left eye get pulled upwards,

and the bottom of the left eye get pulled downwards,

which would make the the left eye open wider like the left side of the mouth has opened wider?

Actually the shrinkage of the left side of the body did make the left eye bigger. The left eye only looks closed because of the monocle. Since the monocle is being treated as if it is the left eye, it can be used as an approximation of the size of the left eye. The monocle has a much larger diameter than the right eye as highlighted in the next picture.

Further support for the claim the left eye has opened wider are the lines around the outside of the left eye. The spacing between the lines indicate a left eye diameter that is much larger then the diameter of the right eye.

The large left eye and the open left side of the mouth both support the conclusion that evil will shrink one side of the body, or perhaps the left side of the body exclusively, in the same way that Masturbation, Excessive Sex, Homosexuality, Injection of Drugs, Snorting of Drugs, and Anorexia shrink one half of the human body.

Mar 132011
 

“Black In The Face” is a term used to describe the energy distribution visible in the face of a human being. The ideal human face should have an even distribution of energy across it’s entire surface. An even distribution of energy across the face would be associated with both good health and a balanced body.

Very generally, there are two causes that will produce the darkening of the face that is called “Black In The Face”. Any type of permanent or temporary health problem will cause a darkening of the face, and both temporary or permanent tightening of the head and body will cause a darkening of the face. The part of the face that becomes dark is directly related to the health problem affecting the individual, or directly related to the part of the head and body that has become tight.

The example picture for this blog entry is shown below.

The line in the next picture follows the boundary between the light and dark areas of the girl’s face.

This girl has “Right Side Black In The Face. The right side of her head is not filled out as it should be, so it appears dark. Because the right side of her head is not filled out, it is not strong enough to hold her head erect. The girl’s head exhibits a slight tilt the right as highlighted in the next picture.

Someone who has read through the previous entries in this series might be ready to label this example as a severe case of “Black In The Face”, because the condition of the girl’s right eye matches the eyes of other example individuals in this series who were described as severe cases. The girl’s right eye is so dark it almost looks like a dark cave.

The girl’s left eye is changed in a way that would be described as “a severe bodily change” if it was the result of some kind of bodily abuse. The reason the eye of the girl is not being labeled “severe”, is because the changes in her body are age related and not related to bodily abuse of some kind.

Instead of bodily abuse degenerating and harming the right eye until it becomes like a dark black cave, the young girl’s right eye looks like a dark black cave because it is not fully grown. As the girl ages, the right side of her body and head should grow into and fill out the left eye, until it appears bright and healthy like the left eye does in this picture.

So to be clear, from a scientific standpoint, the girl’s left eye is degenerated or not working properly by an amount which does qualify for the label “severe”.

Because she is young and the left eye should look normal when she gets older, the author would argue that “severe” is an improper label, because the word “severe” gives the impression the problem is irreparable and permanent. 

Feb 282011
 

The story that is the subject of this blog entry testifies to the immorality of scientists.The story describes various historical instances in which scientists used human beings as guinea pigs for science experiments.

No caring, sympathetic, or empathetic human being can do anything to another human being that will cause them pain or upset. That means scientists, whose job is supposedly to help their fellow human beings through scientific discoveries, are uncaring, unsympathetic, and have no empathy at all.

Scientists are dangerously stoopid individuals who have no compunction about giving someone like you or me a disease just because they want to see what happens, or doing whatever they think is best to us, regardless of what we tell them.

The original story is reprinted next

——————————————

Uncovered old pictures provide documents that US doctors working for the government carried out unethical experiments on disabled citizens and prison inmates.

During a meeting in Washington, US officials acknowledged that in the 20th century government doctors had done a series of medical experiments on the country’s own citizens that often involved making healthy people sick.

While much of the experiments were carried out 40 to 80 years ago, it is the backdrop for this week’s meeting in Washington of a presidential bioethics commission.

The meeting was triggered by the US government’s apology last year for federal doctors infecting prisoners and mental patients in Guatemala with syphilis 65 years ago.

However, later on the US officials also acknowledged there had been dozens of similar experiments in America, which often involved making healthy people sick.

An Associated Press review of medical journal reports and decades-old press clippings found more than 40 such studies, which some just amounted to curiosity-satisfying experiments that hurt people but provided no useful result.

The emerged shocking experiments included infecting mental patients in Connecticut with hepatitis, exposing prisoners in Maryland to a pandemic flu virus, injecting cancer cells into chronically ill people at a New York hospital, and infecting prison inmates with gonorrhea at a federal penitentiary in Atlanta.

Media never covered most of the newly uncovered studies done from the 1940s to the 1960s. However, in those reported the coverage centered on the breakthrough and not how test subjects were treated.

At that time, many famous researchers believed that it was legitimate to do experiment on people who did not have full rights in society such as prisoners, mental patients or the poor blacks.

However, experts believe that all such studies violated the concept of “first do no harm,” that is a fundamental medical principle.

Although, individuals included in these studies were usually described as volunteers, historians and ethicists have questioned how well these people understood what was to be done to them and why, or whether they were coerced.

“When you give somebody a disease — even by the standards of their time — you really cross the key ethical norm of the profession,” said Arthur Caplan, director of the University of Pennsylvania’s Center for Bioethics.

Using prisoners as guinea pigs was continued in the US for decades and even increased significantly late in 1940s and 1950s after the huge growth of drug industries.

This happened while prosecution of Nazi doctors in 1947 led to the “Nuremberg Code,” a set of international rules to protect human test subjects. However, many US doctors ignored them for years, arguing that the rule applied to Nazi atrocities and not to American medicine.

In later decades after the new guidelines enacted by the US government limited the human experiments on American prisoners and mental patients, researchers looked to other countries to find new experimental fields.

The target was poor countries that launching clinical trials in them were much cheaper and less limited due to the lack of rules. Even more the situation of the poor nations brought the US researchers and drug companies new opportunities to find patients who were taking no medication, a factor that can complicate tests of other drugs.

While, later additional sets of guidelines were enacted against overseas experiments, some reports still suggest that US industries are continuing their habits of using people instead of animal or lab samples.

During the last 15 years, two international studies sparked outrage. One was likened to Tuskegee. US-funded doctors failed to give the AIDS drug AZT to all the HIV-infected pregnant women in a study in Uganda even though it would have protected their newborns.

The other study, by Pfizer Inc., gave an antibiotic named Trovan to children with meningitis in Nigeria, although there were doubts about its effectiveness for that disease. Critics blamed the experiment for the deaths of 11 children and the disabling of scores of others.

Last year, the US Department of Health and Human Services’ inspector general reported that between 40 and 65 percent of clinical studies of federally regulated medical products were done in other countries in 2008, and that proportion probably has grown.

The report also noted that US regulators inspected less than 1 percent of foreign clinical trial sites.

Uncovering what the US doctors had done in Guatemala was an opening for the Obama administration to have the bioethics panel seek a new evaluation of international medical studies.

To focus on federally funded international studies, the bioethics commission has formed an international panel of about a dozen experts. Regarding the Guatemala study, it has hired 15 staff investigators and is working with more historians and consulting experts.

The panel is to send a report to President Barack Obama by September. Any further steps would be up to the administration

Feb 272011
 

This series of blog posts presents examples of heads that are interesting for some reason related to Phrenology and/or Happeh Theory. The example image for this blog post is shown above.

The science of Phrenology claims that the size and shape of the head is related to the personality and mentality of a human being. Modern science states that the claims of Phrenology are false, and that the science of Phrenology is superstitious nonsense.

Please take a moment to closely examine the example image while making your own personal judgement about the two men in the picture.

If Modern Science is right that the science of Phrenology is nonsense, the reader should feel that both men are have similar personalities and similar mentalities even though they have vastly different head shapes.

The majority of readers though will decide that the two men have different personalities and different mentalities. What is the reader basing that decision on? The strongest influence has to be the shape of each man’s head because the photograph is focused on their heads. The only other thing that might give the reader something to judge the men by would be their skin color or the condition of their upper body.

Since it seems obvious that Modern Scientists are foolish, what is it about the heads of the two men that gives the reader clues the two men have different personalities and mentalies? The science of Phrenology is very simple and the factors used to make decisions about other human beings are trivial to observe. The observations the science of Phrenology and/or Happeh Theory would use to judge the condition of the two men follow.

The shape of the black man’s head is very complex. That complex shape is outlined in the next picture.

In contrast, the Hispanic man’s head has a very simple shape as highlighted by the outline in this picture.

The main differences between the two heads that the reader, the science of Phrenology, or Happeh Theory, use to judge the personality and mentality of each of the men, include the almost flat back of the Hispanic man’s head,

and the mostly flat front of his face.

In contrast, the front of the black man’s face is made up of large bumps and deep valleys.

The back of the black man’s head looks like a huge bump compared to the flat back of the head of the Hispanic man.

It is the position of Happeh Theory that regular people, without even realizing it, use the principles of Phrenology every day when they meet others. Their life experience has taught them that if they meet a man with a flat back of the head, that man will display a certain personality and mentality. If they meet a man with a big bump sticking out of the back of his head, that man will have a different personality and mentality.

From a scientific perspective, the difference in the personality and mentality of both men can be explained with nothing more than the simple concept of volume. The flattish head of the Hispanic man surrounds a certain volume of brain that influences his personality and mentality.

That volume is represented by the half pint bottle shown in this picture.

The head of the black man with all of the bumps on the front of his face and the huge bump on the back of his head means the volume surrounded by his head is larger,

and represented by the one quart bottle in this picture.

A child knows that the larger bottle contains more fluid than the smaller bottle,

so of course there is more of whatever inside of the larger volume skull of the black man than there is inside of the smaller volume skull of the Hispanic man.

It is nothing more than common sense that if there is more of “something” inside of the head of the black man, then his personality and mentality would be different than the personality and mentality of the Hispanic man who has less of the “something” in his smaller volume head.

Feb 252011
 

According to Happeh Theory, every insulting physical gesture created by every human culture that ever has existed, was inspired by the actual physical appearance of a weak or inferior human being. This blog entry discusses one of those insulting physical gestures, which is shown in the following picture.

The insulting gesture is made by holding the left hand up to the face,

fully extending the thumb and touching it’s tip to the tip of nose,

while the fingers are extended and splayed apart.

The man’s mouth is hanging open,

and his tongue is hanging out of his mouth.

All of those relatively small movements of individual parts of the body, are accompanied by a leaning forwards of the entire upper body and the head.

According to Happeh Theory, the collection of body movements involved in making that insult, are the same movements that are made uncontrollably, by human beings who have a weak or undeveloped Yin part of the body. The affected individuals literally cannot stop those parts of their body from moving the way they do.

The gesture is an insult because it is saying “I know you cannot stop yourself from making this physical movement I am performing, because you have a weak Yin part of the body, which we all know means you are physically and mentally weak”.

The next picture shows an example human being whose body displays the signs of weak Yin meant to be mocked or insulted by the gesture the other man was shown performing.

The first thing to note is that both men have one hand up by their face.

Even though the man whose body is changed has only one finger sticking up in the air,

the hand of his energy body can be visualized as looking almost exactly like the hand of the man making the insulting gesture.

The mouth of the man with relatively weak Yin,

is hanging slightly open in a way similar to the way the man making the insulting gesture is opening his mouth.

If the man’s allowed his tongue to fall into it’s natural position instead of consciously holding it inside of his mouth, it would hang slightly outside of his mouth like the tongue of the man making the insulting gesture.

The appearance of the left eye of the man with weak Yin is the strongest indicator that the man does have a weak Yin part of the body.  The man’s left eye is clearly smaller than his right eye.

The right eye is nice and round and wide open,


while the left eye is smaller and darker.


The man’s left eye looks smaller and tighter because the entire left side of his face is shrunken.

The man’s shrunken and weak Yin, whose condition was determined by the just pointed out observations about his body, cannot prevent the man’s body from making the collection of movements, that are being mocked by the insulting physical gesture demonstrated in this picture.