HappehCom

Sep 182011
 

This blog is devoted to things that could be described as “secrets” of life. Many of  “The Secrets of Life” found in this blog are nothing more than observations of the world around us. Many people move through the world without ever really looking at it. So to them, the simple observations about life found in this blog seem to be “secrets”

This particular blog entry is focused on the following picture of some Chinese monks who are urinating.

The Chinese monks are men. Why are they squatting down to urinate? In western countries usually only women squat to urinate. Most men urinate from a standing position.

Why would Chinese monks urinate in a way that seems strange to people from the west?

For the same reason many other people around the world squat to urinate. The picture of the Chinese monks shows them outside urinating. Squatting to urinate is so common that there are toilets made for people who squat to urinate. And that is not just some small section of the public like a handicapped toilet. Toilets designed for squatting urination are the norm in places like China

Japan

Africa

Turkey

and many other places around the world. In fact it is people in the west who are actually the strange ones for using seated toilets. There are many more people in the world population that use squat toilets than use seat toilets.

Some of the “Secrets of Life” found in this blog do consist of something more than simple observation of the world around us. While the above pictures demonstrate that squat toilets are more the norm for human beings than seat toilets are, there has still been no reason provided for why squat toilets are the norm for the majority of the human beings on the planet earth.

It would be easy to claim that modern technology is the reason why squat toilets are more prevalent than seat toilets. Seat toilets were not invented until after the industrial revolution had begun. So the adoption of seat toilets would of course be lower in the worldwide population than squat toilets which required no modern technology.

The problem with that claim would be modern squat toilets. All of the toilets in the pictures above were made of porcelin or plastic. If each of those countries have access to technology to make porcelin or plastic, why didn’t they make seat toilets like people in the West? Why did they make so called “primitive” squat toilets with modern technology?

Because there really is a “Secret of Life” in the difference between squatting to urinate and standing to urinate. For people that like mysteries and secrets, the reason why the Chinese monks are squatting to urinate is for the same reason dogs lift their legs to urinate.

It will take the reader more than simple observation to figure out why a human being squatting to urinate is like a dog lifting it’s leg to urinate. It might be easy to figure out the reason why because the reason why is simple. But it will probably be hard because it does take either some education or a particular way of thinking to figure it out.

Because readers have made it known that they find the mysterious “Secrets of Life” blog entries frustrating, the blog entries where no explanation is provided and the reader is urged to figure things out on their own, a hint will be provided to help figure out this blog entry.

Here is a picture of men using a seat toilet.

The next picture compares one of the men on the seat toilet with a woman who is pretending to use a squat toilet.

Take a minute to examine the picture for differences. The man’s buttocks are on the seat of the toilet while the woman is standing up of course. Do you see anything else that is different between the man and the woman? Remember. The “Secrets of Life” are usually not really secrets, they are just detailed observations of the world around us.

The man’s leg when sitting on the seat toilet is mostly straight up and down.

The legs of the woman demonstrating using the squat toilet are at an angle.

If you can figure out what effect sitting on a seat toilet with the legs straight up and down has on the human body, figure out what effect supporting the body weight on the feet while angling the legs inwards has on the human body, then compare the two for differences, you should be able to figure out why a Chinese monk who squats to urinate is like a dog lifting it’s leg to urinate.

 

Sep 172011
 

This picture shows an old scientific picture of a modern man.

The next picture shows a picture of a Neanderthal from the same old scientific source. A Neanderthal is supposed to be one of the ancestors of Modern Man.

The next picture compares the Modern Man to the Neanderthal man.

Please take a moment to study the two pictures to look for what is arguably the biggest difference between the two different humanoids.

The difference in height between the two humanoids is not the major difference. Please examine the two pictures again to find some other major difference.

Disregarding the difference in height between the Modern Man and the Neanderthal, the biggest difference between the two humanoids is found in the face. The face of the Modern Man looks flat while the face of the Neanderthal looks like it sticks out from the head.

The next picture shows a close up of both the head of the Modern Man and the Neanderthal.

The flat face of the Modern Man and the protruding face of the Neanderthal Man are highlighted in the next picture.

What could account for the differences in the face of the Modern Man and the Neanderthal Man? What is it exactly that is responsible for the protruding face of a Neanderthal Man to turn into the flat face of a Modern Man?

A scientist might say that it was the Process of Evolution that changed the protruding face of Neanderthal Man into the flat face of Modern Man. While that might be an accurate answer, it does not provide any concrete information on the actions involved in changing a protruding Neanderthal Face into a flat Modern Man face. There are no specific details on how the Process of Evolution changed the protruding face of a Neanderthal man into the flat face of a Modern Man.

Another scientist might then propose that it was genetics that changed the protruding Neanderthal Man’s face into the flat face of a Modern Man. The DNA of the Neanderthal Man gave specific instructions to the genes of the Neanderthal Man to make it stop growing a protruding face and start growing the flat face of Modern Man.

The DNA and gene proposal still does not explain exactly how a protruding Neanderthal Man face turned into a flat Modern Man face. What instructions did the DNA of the Neanderthal Man give to the genes of the Neanderthal Man to make them start growing a flat Modern Man face?

While Happeh Theory cannot answer the question, “What instructions did Neanderthal Man DNA give to Neanderthal man genes to make them grow a flat Modern Man face?”, Happeh Theory can provide an alternate explanation for how a protruding Neanderthal Man face turned into a flat Modern Man face, that provides an actual method or action that changed the protruding face of Neanderthal Man into the flat face of Modern Man.

The explanation will begin with this picture of some mushrooms.

Everything except one of the mushrooms is then removed from the picture. That mushroom is manipulated a little bit to produce the picture of a single mushroom shown next.

The single mushroom is then compared to the Neanderthal skull.

The Neanderthal skull and the mushroom have similar shapes. The next picture shows the mushroom superimposed on the Neanderthal skull.

If the center of the mushroom is approximately centered on the neck of the Neanderthal, the way the base of the mushroom cap sticks out from the mushroom looks like the way the front of a Neanderthal’s face sticks out from it’s head.

Does it seem like it could be a coincidence that a mushroom and a Neanderthal head look similar? It could be but it isn’t. The similarity between the look of a Neanderthal head and the look of a mushroom is because everything in the universe is constructed according to the same Laws of the Universe.

If everything in the universe is constructed according to a certain set of laws, and those laws made the head of a Neanderthal Man and a mushroom head look the same, why is it that the head of a Modern Man does not look like a mushroom or a Neanderthal head?

The next picture compares the head of the Modern Man to the mushroom.

The mushroom is then superimposed on the head of the Modern Man.

The outlines in the picture highlight how the base of the mushroom extends out past the flat face of the Modern Man.

Is the reason that the face of a Modern Man is flat because the face of Modern Nan is not constructed according to the Laws of the Universe? That can’t be right. A Modern Man is inside of the universe so a Modern Man must be constructed according to the same Laws of the Universe that governed the construction of Neanderthal Man or a mushroom.

What could it be that changed the protruding mushroom like face of a Neanderthal Man into the non mushroom like flat face of a Modern Man? According to Happeh Theory it was shrinkage of the mushroom. The flat face of Modern Man is like a mushroom. A small mushroom instead of a large mushroom though.

Instead of being a large mushroom with a large diameter base

that protrudes out in front of the head,

the mushroom inside of the flat faced head of Modern Man has a small enough diameter that the base of the mushroom is behind the boundary of the face.

The diameter reduced mushroom no longer sticks out past the Modern Man’s face.

Why is it helpful to compare the head of Neanderthal Man and Modern Man to a mushroom, then claim that the face of a Neanderthal Man protrudes because a Neanderthal Man’s head is like a large diameter mushroom, and to claim that the face of a Modern Man is flat because the mushroom inside of it has a small enough diameter that it does not make the face of Modern Man protrude?

Because it is trivial to understand how a mushroom is constructed according to the Laws of the Universe. And it is similarly trivial to envision how that specific type of construction would have to be changed to make it shrink in size.

Once the reader knows how a mushroom is constructed and the way that construction would have to be manipulated to make it shrink in size, they can apply that knowledge to the heads of both the Neanderthal Man and the Modern Man, because according to Happeh Theory, a human being is partially constructed like a mushroom.

Any human being can benefit in a real world way from understanding how a human body is constructed like a mushroom. That knowledge can be used to turn oneself into a superior human being who will gain powers that a large number of other human beings do not have.

According to Scientists, Modern Man is more evolved than Neanderthal Man. That means scientists believe that Neanderthals were lesser creatures than Modern Man is.

What if scientists were wrong? What if Neanderthal man was a more evolved human being than a Modern Man? That would mean that the human race is de-evolving or going backwards, instead of evolving and going forwards.

How could a person know if Scientists were right or wrong about Modern Man being more than Neanderthals, and Neanderthals being less than Modern Man? How could a person know if human bodies were evolving into something superior or de-evolving into something lesser?

That person would need to figure out what the connection between mushrooms and Neanderthals is first. That knowledge could then be used to decide if Neanderthal Man or Modern Man is superior.

It might be a value judgement in the eyes of some, but for the creator of this blog there is no doubt that in ways that can be easily described and understood, Neanderthal Man is superior to Modern Man. Which means that the human race is de-evolving into something lesser than it once was.

Sep 152011
 

Human beings originally evolved from a single cell floating in the ocean. According to Happeh Theory, just about everything worth knowing about the human body, can but inferred by study of the original single cell that human beings sprang from.

This blog entry contains sexually explicit images. Do not continue if sexually explicit images offend you.

A single cell reproduces through a process called cell division. The cell splits itself into two identical new cells. The picture below is of an uncompleted cell division process. The two new cells are still connected to each other.

In the next picture, the cell has been turned so it is vertical.

Then the vertical dividing cell is cut in half, so that only the upper half is shown.

What do you see when you look at that picture? Obviously you see half of a dividing cell. What else do you see? There is a gray color. There is the outer boundary of the dividing cell. There is some grainy looking stuff inside of the cell. Then there is a smooth looking area somewhat in the center of the cell.

Do you see anything else. Anything connected to the human body perhaps? Remember. According to Happeh Theory, insight into the modern human body can be gained by simple examination of the single cell. That picture is of a single cell, so there should be something there that provides insight into the human body.

Take a look at the next picture.

There are two single cells side by side in the picture. A male penis has been superimposed on one of the cells, so that it overlaps the smooth area inside of the cell.

If you compare the penis inside of the cell, to the smooth area in the other cell, you should notice that the shapes are similar. The smooth area inside of the dividing cell has a penis shape to it.

That is not the only insight into the human body that can be found in this picture though. Here is the next picture.

There is now only the head of a male human penis compared to the dividing cell. The overall shape of the dividing cell and the head of the penis look similar. In the picture below, the head of the penis and part of the cell have been outlined to highlight their similarity.

The dividing cell and the penis head look similar. They both have a semicircular outer shape, with a keyhole shape in the center. In the cell, the keyhole shape is the smooth area of the cell. In the penis, there is a natural divide between the two sides of the penis head.

The next picture outlines only the smooth area of the dividing cell, and the natural divide of the human male penis head.

As is clearly visible in the picture, both the dividing cell and the penis have a primitive keyhole type shape to them. There is a rectangular or triangular bottom half, that rises up to a circular area.

Are those similarities a coincidence?

Really?

Sep 142011
 

Leonardo Da Vinci is a famous Italian artist and scientist who lived and died around 1450 to 1520. Leonardo Da Vinci is famous because he was a prolific creator who produced works in many fields.

According to Happeh Theory, one of Leonardo Da Vinci’s most well known creations demonstrates his knowledge of the Yin and Yang parts of the human body.

Yin Yang Theory is a theory that is said to have been developed thousands of years ago in Asia. According to Yin Yang Theory, everything in the universe can be described in terms of Yin and Yang. Yin is traditionally described as relatively soft, while Yang is traditionally described as relatively hard.

Since the human body is an object located within the universe, the human body can be described in terms of Yin and Yang. Many different ways of using the terms Yin and Yang to discuss the construction, the behavior, and the health of the human body were developed by Asian people.

One of those ways is a simple generalized description of how a human body is constructed. According to Yin Ying Theory, the outside or external part of the human body is Yang, while the internal part of the body is Yin.

What exactly are the external and internal parts of a human body?The definitions for the internal and external parts of the human body are based on a human body that is on all fours like an animal.

The external part of a human body is traditionally defined as the outside of the arms,

the outside of the legs,

and the back.

The next picture shows the human body on four legs with one side of the body rotated upwards so the underside or internal part of the body can be seen.

The internal part of the human body is traditionally defined as the inside of the arms,

the inside of the legs,

and the front of the body.

The well known creation of Leonardo Da Vinci’s that demonstrates his knowledge of Yin and Yang is a drawing that is called “The Proportions of the Human Figure”. An image of the drawing is shown below.

The drawing shows a human body standing with the arms out to the side and the legs mostly straight up and down.

Another pair of arms sticks upwards at approximately a 30 degree angle and another pair of legs sticks out to the side of the body at approximately a 30 degree angle.

The drawing by Leonardo Da Vinci looks like one body with two arms and two legs. The exact same look would occur though if a human body with the arms held out to the side,

and a human body with the arms and legs spread outwards at a 30 degree angle,

were superimposed directly on top of each other.

The torso and head look like one torso and one head because they are directly on top of each other. Both pairs of arms and both pairs of legs can be seen though because they are not directly on top of each other.

The next picture compares the Leonardo Da Vince drawing to the two computer model human bodies that were superimposed on top of each other.

According to Happeh Theory, The human body behaves as if it is constructed out of two complete human bodies that were merged into one. One of those constituent bodies is the Yang body, which according to Happeh Theory, is demonstrated in Da Vinci’s drawing by the body with the arms out level and the legs straight up and down.

The other constituent human body is the Yin body, which is demonstrated in Da Vinci’s drawing by the body with the arms and legs spread at a 30 degree angle.

An individual might reasonably say “There is no proof that Leonardo Da Vinci drew that picture to demonstrate the Yin and Yang parts of the body. The drawing is really just a drawing of the proportions of the human body like the title says”.

If that was really true, does it matter? If Leonardo Da Vinci’s purpose in producing the drawing was not to depict the Yin and Yang parts of a human body, the drawing still has value for teaching people about the Yin and Yang parts of the human body in a simple way, because that is what the drawing shows.

The claims of Happeh Theory are never made without some kind of train of logic or corroborating evidence to support them. For the claim about the purpose of the drawing of Leonardo Da Vinci,corroborating evidence comes from the country of India.

The inhabitants of the country of India practice a religion called Hinduism. Hinduism is a pantheistic religion which means they have multiple gods. One of the gods of the Hindu religion is a god named Kali. The next picture shows a picture of a statue of Kali.

The god Kali has four arms,

just like Leonardo Da Vinci’s drawing has four arms.

Is that just a coincidence? Of course it is not a coincidence. Did Leonardo Da Vinci steal the idea for his drawing from the Hindu religion? That might be possible in some way but it is not very likely.

According to Happeh Theory, the god Kali has four arms for the same reason that Leonardo Da Vinci’s drawing has four arms. The statue of Kali with four arms is a depiction of the Yin and Yang parts of the arm.

India is an Asian country that has been exposed to the concepts of Yin Yang Theory. India is next to China where Yin Yang Theory was developed. The Indian people have the same familiarity with the Yin and Yang parts of the human body as the Chinese people who developed Yin Yang Theory do.

According to Happeh Theory, it is just as natural for the Indian people who know that a human body behaves as if it has a pair of Yang arms and a pair of Yin arms, to develop a stature showing a human being with that four armed look,

as it was for Leonardo Da Vinci the scientist, with the motivations of a scientist to preserve knowledge for future generations, to pass on to the people of the future his knowledge that a human body behaves like it has a pair of Yin arms and a pair of Yang arms, with his drawing titled “the proportions of the human body”.

 

Sep 132011
 

Another post in this blog stated the symbol of Chinese origin in the following picture was a representation of a human being.

No attempt was made in that post to explain why or how the symbol represented a human body.

This post presents information that can help figure out why the symbol represents a human being. That information comes from what Happeh Theory calls “The Seed View Of The Human Body”.

According to The Seed View of the Human Body, the human body can behave as if it is a seed, or as if it sprouted from a seed. Here is a picture of some walnuts, which are seeds for walnut trees.

A seed consists of a relatively soft center section with a hard covering as demonstrated in this drawing.

The next picture looks down on a seed from the end. Their is a whitish spot in the center that is part of the inside of the seed. The hard outside of the side is a darker color.

The previous picture should give the reader an indication where this discussion is going. The next picture shows a seed that is partially sprouted.

The next picture shows a seed which has turned into a plant. The hard outer seed covering is still on part of the plant.

The next picture compares the dragon symbol to the germinating seed.

The center of the seed corresponds to the center of the Chinese symbol,

while each side of the hard outer covering corresponds to one of the dragons on either side of the center of the Chinese symbol.

According to Yin Yang Theory, there is an internal and external part of the body. Looking at a seed, the growing part of the seed is the internal part of the seed, while the protective part of the seed is the external part of the seed.

In the next picture, each half of the outer seed covering still on the seedling was extended so it looks vaguely like a dragon shape. Then the altered seedling was rotated to put it in approximately the same orientation as the Chinese symbol.

Think about all of that for awhile.